Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Your Review


Rate your book 1-4 stars, 1 star being the worst book you ever read, 4 being the best. Explain why you gave your book the score you did, in 3-4 detailed sentences.

10 comments:

Camille Ridge said...

I would rate my book (The hounds of Baskerville) a 3 because it wasn't my favorite book ever but I liked the way it was written. Like you had Dr.Watson's point of view and he thought like a normal person but then you have his friend Sherlock Holmes who knows what everything means and put the story together. I also liked how they showed you characters that seemed like they were the bad guys but made it hard at first to guess who really was the bad guy. So for the rating I would give it a 3 for those reasons.

Kira Babcock said...

My book,The Hound of the Baskervilles, was a 4, Because it was full of suspense and action. It is made of many describing words that make you feel like you are really in the story. It was also a mystery.
I like this book because it was thrilling and used lots of logic.

Tyler Goldberg said...

I think that I'd give 10 Little Indians or And Then There Where None a 4 because its a very interesting murder mystery, that keeps me reading! I love how at the end of every chapter, Agatha Cristie leaves her readers wondering what will happen next! I would recommend this book to everyone who likes murder mystery's.

Jazlin period 4 said...

I rate my book (The city of Ember) 5 Stars because its a really good book. First i like the way there in "Darkness". I like how its a fiction book too. i think that it had a lot of action. So why i like this book is because it is like a maze, they have to figure out how to get out so in a maze you have to try and get out.

Maddie H p.3 said...

I would give the Hound of the Baskervilles a 3.5 rating. I say that because it was better than average, but still not spectacular. It was really suspenseful at times, but at other times, it was really slow. It was well written and I really liked that we got Watson's point of view on everything. I like mysteries, but I like settings that are more present. Overall, I think The Hound of the Baskervilles was a pretty good book, for those reasons.

Andrew Period 4 said...

I would rate The Hound of Baskervilles a 3 because there was some action, but I thought some of the book was dull, and boring. Near the end, though it got better. Also, it kept you thinking, I probably changed my mind 20 times about who I thought the criminal was. That is why I would rate my book a 3.

Jordan McD period 3 said...

If I was to rate the book The Hound of Baskerville my decision would probably be a 3 on a 1-4 scale. The reason the book would be a 3 would be because the book, in my opinion, was good but not amazing. It was an interesting mystery book that tried to lead the reader in to thinking the answer to the mystery was a ghost hound. The book had teh greatest detective working the case to make it more interesting too. As a result, The Hound of Baskerville was good but not great.

Ahmed Suja said...

I would rate my book (The people of sparks) a 5 because it is a really good book. first of all I really like how the author tells us when the lights went off and how they found there way out of ember. And lastly how the second book they start a new life in sparks

Lukus97 said...

I would rate my book (Point Blank) a 4 because it was a really good and I could see what it was like to see the characters. So far in the book it is really interesting. I could see the character and Point Blank and what the characters look like.

Aleesa B. said...

I rate my book (The Hounds of Baskerville) a 2.5 because i couldn't really get in to it and sometimes i couldn't understand it either. I also thought i was very intriguing and you always wanted to find out what happened next. they through you off so many times to really figuring out who the bad guy was. (=